top of page

About 
the
Project

Sunsetting Legacy Systems for a Modernized Product

​Overview
Collaborated on updating a legacy system by integrating its functionality into an existing, modern product already undergoing redesign.

​

Problem Statement
The organization needed to sunset the legacy product while ensuring seamless transformation of data tables and the modernization of outdated screens for integration into the updated platform.

​

Role
UX Designer – conducted research, developed wireframes, and created prototypes to support the transition.

​

Solution

Redesigned complex data tables into streamlined, efficient workflows and processes.
Updated screens with modernized features and new components to align with the updated product's overall design language.


Outcome & Impact

Boosted user interest in the modernized product.
Designed 10+ new features that enhanced usability and productivity.
Achieved a 10% increase in user satisfaction.
Improved information flow efficiency by 16%.

 

Accomplishments

Streamlined a workflow process to incorporate more collaboration between designers, developers, and business analysts.

Implemented and designed 16% of the product's functionality.

Designed over 10+ new or updated features, including: Adding and Updating Cash Credit Line, Skip Auto Pay, Pricing Strategy, and Method Override

Implemented and presented documentation to update the current design system.

pscu

PSCU Logo

Introducing PSCU, our recent project that focuses on creating a dashboard concept for credit union agents. By integrating multiple tools into a single platform, PSCU aims to improve workflow efficiency and streamline tasks for credit union agents. The project showcases our commitment to innovation and creating user-friendly solutions for financial institutions.

Project Iterations

*Promotions
*Pricing Strategy

Promotions

Problem/Requirement

Redesign four data heavy promotion screens for a better user experience. These screens are from the back end or admin level of the system.

Design Thinking

Since the way the data is displayed was requested to not be changed, UX will examine the best way to structure and display all screens for the user. Do we want to keep them as seperate entities or combine them?

Solution

The screens are related to promotions so UX has decided to optimize the screen, reduce loading times, and easily access each area by using tabs.

Brainstorming/Wireframes

Wireframes  boxes and lines no images or color

Single Page

Anchor/Jump Links

Tabs

Original Screens

Acct Balance screenshot from PSCU system
Statement screenshot from PSCU system

*Originally four screens but only showing two*

Redesigned Screens

Promo Captions redesigned screenshot - info with tabs about promotion, terms, controls, and balance

Design Process

1. Top Header Bar - information is prominent in three out of  four screens. Highlighting this info in a bar header to emphasis important user info

2. Tabs - design for user to easily access each info and to move quickly while looking and locating information

3. Data space - per requirements format exactly like the original screen; elevated fields is information that can be changed/updated.

4. Cancel - button to cancel changes

5. Update - button to save and update changes

Pricing Strategy

Problem/Requirement

Convert data tables information for Current, Next, Next2 into processes where a user can select the specific override and elect to remove or delete the selected override.

Design Thinking

One of the initial requirements was to give the user the option to delete and remove. From a UX perspective we needed clarification on the remove/delete request as most users use and know the terms interchangeably. Our main focus was to not confuse the user and then focus on designing the data into a design where users can functionally understand and use the process.

Solution

Upon clarification and reassurance that most users who will use this feature will know the difference between remove and delete, UX decided to further prevent error prevention and understanding by providing content in the popup/dialog box that will further let the user know the difference between the two functions. UX designs will show how the user can select the fields related to the override to delete and remove.

Brainstorming/Wireframes

Method Override Wireframes

Stepper

Cards

Original Screens

*Replica of the data table*

Data tables examples - generic

Redesigned Screens

Pricing Strategy Captions redesigned screenshot
Popup message for Method Override

Design Process

1. Tabs - easy for user to access informaton from different locations under the same category

2. Dropdown - user can select which method they are updating, conserves screen space, and save users time scrolling the page.

3. Cards - groups the related information so the user can easily understand the action they are updating for each method

4. Delete Options - user will be able to select 'Remove' or 'Delete' (i.e. Remove has a certain date the override can be removed and Delete the override will be deleted the same day).

5. Cancel - button to cancel the changes

6. Confirm - button to save and update changes

* 'Current' card only has one option which is 'Delete' which is represented with a checkbox.

Journey Mapping/
User Flows

bottom of page